This week I've followed both the "Climategate" controversy and lack of controversy, that is, the simultaneous media reaction and lack of reaction to the electronic documents and communications stolen from the servers of the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in England.  The possibility that test results unsupportive of man-made global warming have been swept under the scientific rug is profoundly disturbing.  Yes, disturbing enough for me to use an adverb.

As I recall from my own days in scientific research, the scientific method boils down to the following:

*  Ask "the question"

*  Do preliminary research

*  Formulate your hypothesis about the question

*  Test the hypothesis experimentally, collect data and analyze results

*  Draw a conclusion that accepts or rejects your hypothesis

*  Communicate your results/conclusions along with recommendations for future experiments

The process of scientific research should not include concealing data or preventing the communication of results and conclusions.  Nor should scientists close themselves off from criticism.  The scientific method should serve as a tool in humanity's search for truth.

I hope to see this matter clarified in an informative and non-sensationalistic manner.

Will investigative "heroes" please arise?

Laurel Anne Hill (http://www.laurelannehill.com)

Read and post comments | Send to a friend